Reference & AI

AFI 36-2406

Air Force

OFFICER AND ENLISTED EVALUATIONS SYSTEMS

Reviewed by Guilherme Correia, active-duty U.S. Air Force

AFI 36-2406, "OFFICER AND ENLISTED EVALUATIONS SYSTEMS", is a Department of the Air Force publication, dated August 22, 2025, certified current May 27, 2026.

Published

August 22, 2025

certified current May 27, 2026

OPR

AF/A1

Headquarters, Department of the Air Force

Official document

Open the PDF

on static.e-publishing.af.mil

AFI 36-2406 — index record

NumberAFI 36-2406
TitleOFFICER AND ENLISTED EVALUATIONS SYSTEMS
PublishedAugust 22, 2025
Certified currentMay 27, 2026
Guidance memorandumAugust 7, 2026
Office of primary responsibilityAF/A1
Issued byHeadquarters, Department of the Air Force
Status on the indexCurrent
Last index actionGM, August 7, 2026
Source indexAir Force e-Publishing
Index last readOctober 20, 2026

Copied from Air Force e-Publishing (index). The publication itself is the authority; this page does not summarize or interpret it. Verify the current edition on the index before acting.

From the publication itself

Text below is lifted mechanically from the official PDF (252 pages, read October 20, 2026) with no editing or interpretation. Quote the document, not this page.

Purpose, in the publication’s words

This publication implements Department of the Air Force Policy Directive (DAFPD) 36-24, Military Evaluations. It provides guidance and procedures for implementing the United States Air Force (USAF) Officer and Enlisted Evaluations Systems. It also describes how to prepare, submit, and manage forms. This instruction has been developed in collaboration between the Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower, Personnel, and Services (AF/A1); Chief of the Air Force Reserve (AF/RE); and the Director of the Air National Guard (NGB/CF). This publication applies to the Regular Air Force (RegAF), Air Force Reserve, and the Air National Guard; it does not apply to the United States Space Force (USSF). This instruction requires the collection and or maintenance of information protected by the Privacy Act of 1974 authorized by Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5400.11, DoD Privacy and Civil Liberties Program. The applicable SORN F036 AF PC A, Effectiveness/Performance Reporting Systems and F036 AFPC T, Officer Performance Report

Summary of changes, as printed

This interim change fully implements previously approved guidance from Air Force Guidance Memorandum (AFGM) 2026-01, by requiring the documentation of physical fitness assessment scores on officer and enlisted evaluations. It also (1) prescribes AF Form 717, Performance Objectives and Feedback Form, and implements guidance on the updated feedback system; (2) authorizes multiple general officers to sign evaluations; (3) emphasizes aligning objectives with major performance areas and competencies with airman leadership qualities (ALQs); (4) clarifies officer stratification quotes; (5) updates guidance on Joint and DAF SNCO stratifications; (6) changes single evaluator requirements for enlisted members; (7) updates single evaluator authorization for deployed commander letters of evaluation (LOEs); and (8) makes several administrative updates throughout the AFI. A margin bar (|) indicates newly revised material.

Contents

  1. Chapter 1—GENERAL CONSIDERATIONSp. 9
  2. Chapter 2—PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK PROCESSp. 58
  3. Chapter 5—DAF FORM 77, LETTER OF EVALUATIONp. 161
  4. Chapter 6—DAF FORM 475, EDUCATION/TRAINING REPORTp. 175
  5. Chapter 7—GENERAL OFFICER EVALUATIONSp. 186
  6. Chapter 9—DAF FORM 3538, RETENTION RECOMMENDATION FORM (RRF)p. 248
  7. Chapter 10—CORRECTING OFFICER AND ENLISTED EVALUATIONSp. 254
  8. Attachment 1—GLOSSARY OF REFERENCES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATIONp. 274
  9. Attachment 2—APPEAL GUIDANCE FOR APPLICANTSp. 294
  10. Attachment 3—NON-RATED PERIOD MEMORANDUMp. 302
All 98 contents entries
  1. Chapter 1—GENERAL CONSIDERATIONSp. 9
  2. 1.1. Purposep. 9
  3. 1.2. Forms - Purpose and Utilizationp. 9
  4. 1.3. General Guidelinesp. 10
  5. 1.4. Preparing and Processing Evaluationsp. 11
  6. 1.5. Evaluator Requirementsp. 20
  7. 1.6. Roles and Responsibilitiesp. 22
  8. 1.7. Rating Chain Deviations and Evaluator Changesp. 29
  9. 1.8. Evaluator’s Mandatory Considerationsp. 32
  10. 1.9. Mandatory Commentsp. 35
  11. 1.10. Disagreementsp. 36
  12. 1.11. Referral Evaluationsp. 37
  13. 1.12. General Prohibited Evaluator Considerations and Commentsp. 43
  14. 1.13. Policy Deviations and Waiver Requestsp. 47
  15. 1.14. Missing, Late, and Removed Performance Evaluationsp. 48
  16. 1.15. Wartime or National Emergency Provisionsp. 49
  17. Chapter 2—PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK PROCESSp. 58
  18. 2.1. Purposep. 58
  19. 2.2. Responsibilitiesp. 58
  20. 2.3. Who Requires a Performance Feedback Assessmentp. 60
  21. 2.4. Guidance for Conducting Performance Feedback Sessionsp. 60
  22. 2.5. When to Conduct Documented Performance Feedback Sessionsp. 60
  23. 2.6. The Performance Feedback Assessment Noticep. 60
  24. 2.7. Performance Feedback Assessment Formp. 61
  25. 2.8. Preparing the Performance Feedback Assessmentp. 61
  26. 2.9. Disposition and Accessp. 61
  27. 2.10. Failure to Conduct or Document a Performance Feedback Assessmentp. 62
  28. 2.11. Tracking Performance Feedback Assessmentsp. 62
  29. 3.1. General Guidelinesp. 68
  30. 3.2. Purposep. 68
  31. 3.3. Who Requires an Officer ALQ Evaluationp. 68
  32. 3.4. Who is Not Authorized an Officer ALQ Evaluationp. 70
  33. 3.5. When to Submit an Officer ALQ Evaluation – Officer Performance Brief (OPB)p. 70
  34. 3.6. Annual Reportsp. 72
  35. 3.12. Number of Days Rater Supervisedp. 77
  36. 3.13. Performance Feedback Assessmentp. 77
  37. 3.14. Higher Level Reviewerp. 77
  38. 3.15. Stratificationsp. 79
  39. 3.16. Unauthorized Evaluator Considerations and Commentsp. 84
  40. 3.17. Extensions of Close-out Datesp. 88
  41. 3.18. Ratee’s Acknowledgementp. 88
  42. 4.1. General Guidelinesp. 109
  43. 4.2. Enlisted Evaluation Formsp. 109
  44. 4.3. When to Accomplish an Enlisted Evaluationp. 109
  45. 4.4. Evaluations not Authorizedp. 110
  46. 4.5. When to Submit an Enlisted Evaluationp. 111
  47. 4.8. Number of Days Rater Supervisedp. 114
  48. 4.9. Completing Evaluationsp. 115
  49. 9 Days Non-Rated Enter number of days Non-Ratedp. 120
  50. 4.12. Higher Level Reviewers and Single Evaluatorsp. 120
  51. 4.13. Higher Level Reviewer Responsibilitiesp. 122
  52. 4.14. Performance Feedback Assessmentp. 123
  53. 4.15. Authorized Evaluator Considerations and Commentsp. 123
  54. 4.17. Ratee’s Acknowledgementp. 124
  55. Chapter 5—DAF FORM 77, LETTER OF EVALUATIONp. 161
  56. 5.1. Purposep. 161
  57. 5.2. Types of LOEsp. 161
  58. 5.3. Who Can Preparep. 163
  59. 5.4. Administrative Practicesp. 164
  60. 5.5. Completing DAF Form 77, Letter of Evaluationp. 164
  61. 5.6. Routing, Updating and Disposition Responsibilitiesp. 164
  62. 5.7. MPF, CSS/HR Specialist, and PERSCO Team Responsibilitiesp. 164
  63. Chapter 6—DAF FORM 475, EDUCATION/TRAINING REPORTp. 175
  64. 6.1. When to Use Training Reports (TRs)p. 175
  65. 6.2. Who Prepares Training Reportsp. 177
  66. 6.3. Referral Training Reportsp. 177
  67. 6.4. Routing and Responsibilitiesp. 177
  68. Chapter 7—GENERAL OFFICER EVALUATIONSp. 186
  69. 7.1. Overviewp. 186
  70. 7.2. Forms Usedp. 186
  71. 7.3. Reasons for Reportsp. 186
  72. 7.4. General Instructionsp. 186
  73. 7.5. Processing General Officer Evaluationsp. 188
  74. 7.6. Extensions of Close-out Datesp. 189
  75. 8.1. DAF Form 709 (for ADL officers)p. 196
  76. 8.2. DAF Form 709 for RASL Officersp. 207
  77. 8.3. Management Level Reviews (ADL Lieutenant Colonel and Below)p. 212
  78. 8.4. Special Provisions (applies to ADL officers only)p. 225
  79. 8.6. Correction of PRFs (ResAF Officers) (“Stop File” Process)p. 230
  80. 8.7. Promotion Recommendations for Colonelsp. 230
  81. Chapter 9—DAF FORM 3538, RETENTION RECOMMENDATION FORM (RRF)p. 248
  82. 9.1. When to Use the DAF Form 3538, Retention Recommendationp. 248
  83. 9.2. Responsibilitiesp. 248
  84. 9.3. Retention Recommendation Form Submissionp. 249
  85. 9.4. Air Force Advisor Examinationp. 249
  86. 9.5. Correction of a Retention Recommendation Formp. 249
  87. Chapter 10—CORRECTING OFFICER AND ENLISTED EVALUATIONSp. 254
  88. 10.1. Purposep. 254
  89. 10.2. Program Elementsp. 254
  90. 10.3. Correcting Evaluationsp. 257
  91. 10.4. Responsibilitiesp. 258
  92. 10.5. Meeting Time Limits and Expedited Requestsp. 261
  93. 10.6. Using Classified, Privacy Act, and Restricted Release Informationp. 262
  94. 10.8. Resubmitting an Appealp. 262
  95. Attachment 1—GLOSSARY OF REFERENCES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATIONp. 274
  96. Attachment 2—APPEAL GUIDANCE FOR APPLICANTSp. 294
  97. 8 Days Supervised Enter number of days ratee wasp. 298
  98. Attachment 3—NON-RATED PERIOD MEMORANDUMp. 302

Other AFI publications nearby in the series

829 AFI records on the Air Force index. Search the full index.

Keep going

Works of the United States Government are not subject to copyright (17 U.S.C. § 105). This site is not affiliated with the Department of the Air Force or any government agency.

Air Force index

REF: AFI 36-2406, effective August 22, 2025

Air Force e-Publishing — AFI 36-2406

This is an index record, not the publication. The official PDF is the authority; verify the current edition before acting.

Reviewed by Guilherme Correia · Military Toolkit editorial

Open the official PDF